Re: OT: sponge burning!
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 23:41:43 -0400, Roberto wrote in message
<[🔎] 20070319034143.GE14000@santiago.connexer.com>:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 07:57:32PM -0700, Paul Scott wrote:
> > Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2007 at 03:26:03AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > >>
> > >>
> > > Are these the same Muslims who are blowing innocent men women and
> > > children in markets schools and other public places?
> > >
> > If I'm not mistaken "we" killed far more innocent men and women and
> > children just bombing into Iraq than any "terrorists" have killed so
> > far.
>
> You are quite mistaken. The Iraq Body Count project (a fairly liberal
> anti-war group) has only managed to attribute about 37% of the Iraqi
> civilian casualties to US and Coalition activities. Which means, that
> in reality the percentage is probably much lower.
..the bodycount and any other details conserning the wellbeing of
civilians, internees, POW etc is the personal responibility of the
Supreme Commander and all members of Any Present Occupant Power.
..Adolf Hitler was responsible for about 2000 dead civilian Norwegians
in occupied Norway in WWII. In his Standgerichte in Norway, over
4000 German Nazi troops were shot for failing to obey das Führerbefehl
"die Norweger von dem Krieg zu schützen."
..Adolf Hitler has moral standing on his Führerbefehl because he put
400,000 men on the job, to protect Norway's 3.5 Million, that's one
per 8.5 norwegian.
.."und Sie, W?"
> > >> ..I was trained for WWIII, nuclear combat against the Soviet
> > >Union > under the full 4 Geneva Conventions, and how to use these
> > >Conventions > as a psyops weapon against the Soviet GI's. Even the
> > >Nazis made > some use of these. But the Bush Regime has declared
> > >them, "old > fashion" and "obsolete." That is precisely why I, as
> > >a civilian, am > _pleased_ to honor Osama bin Laden's 3'rd option,
> > >"Step aside!", > where Sissy Boy George screams "With me, or,
> > >against me!". >
> > >>
> > > Again, your naivete is scary. The Muslims will not be happy until
> > > the Jews and Christians are gone.
> > Then Bush's people have been successful in their fear campaign with
> > you.
>
> Then if you think that "Bush's people" are involved in a fear campaign
> with respect to the threat of Islamic extremism, then they Muslims' PR
> campaign has been successful with you.
>
> Please go read the book described here:
>
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_and_the_Jews:_The_Unfinished_Battle
>
> Then you will see the truth.
..it _is_ a credible hint on why Muslims should join Hezbollah and get
nukes.
> > > Don't you get it? We can't just "go
> > > home" and think that they will never bother us again. To think so
> > > is beyond naive.
> > >
> > What is naive is to think these wars are about religion and
> > terrorists. As long as the US dollar is so connected to oil people
> > like Bush and friends will continue using terror as an excuse to do
> > what they are doing.
> >
> You know what is really funny? If Clinton had done this, the whole
> world would be singing his praises.
>
> Oh wait. He basically did in the form of Operation Desert Fox. But
> then he did it just for show and didn't actually try to fix anything.
> He just lobbed some bombs over there.
..a fair guess is a lot of the 6 million gassed Jews might have
appreciated similar hints.
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;o)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: