Re: top post fixer?
On Wed, Jan 24, 2007 at 09:24:52PM -0500, Steve C. Lamb wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 03:17:17AM +0100, Wim De Smet wrote:
> > One of the reasons I prefer dark on light is the excessive use of blue
> > in ls output (which I tend to use a lot).
>
> So... change it. LS_COLORS controls what colors ls use.
Or alias ls to 'ls -p'/change $LS_OPTIONS from '--color=auto' to '-p' in
~/.bashrc. It gives you most (all?) of the same information as the
color-coding while leaving the ls output the same color as your normal
text.
> > If I'm not mistaken eye doctors will generally
> > advise anyone with problems reading text to use a light-on-dark scheme
> > because of the better contrast.
>
> And I'm betting most aren't taking into account the projective nature of
> monitors and are just defaulting to the same "it's more like paper" line of
> reasoning.
Actually, he said eye doctors recommend light-on-dark to those with
problems, which is not "more like paper"...
--
I would rather be exposed to the inconvenience attending too much Liberty
than those attending too small degree of it.
- Thomas Jefferson
Reply to: