Re: Sylpheed vs. Claws (was Re: thunderbird -> kmail)
On Thu, 2006-04-13 at 21:22 +0200, Sjoerd Hiemstra wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:34:31 -0700 Rodney D. Myers wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 13 Apr 2006 10:29:18 -0700
> > Andrew Sackville-West <andrew@farwestbilliards.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 08:09:44PM +0300, Andrei Popescu wrote:
> > >
> > > > You should give Sylpheed-Claws-GTK2 a try. I'm running unstable
> > > > and it has never crashed on me. The only strange thing I'm
> > > > noticing is that sometimes mail I just read is marked as unread
> > > > again, probably because at a shutdown it gets killed before the
> > > > chance to write the latest changes.
> > >
> > > does it behave well in a tiled WM?
> >
> > Not sure what you mean about "tiled". Under Windowmaker works like a
> > champ
>
> Just for balance, I've used Sylpheed for many years, and it has always
> been rock stable.
> My WM is Blackbox, but it works well on every other WM/DE I've seen.
> I prefer Sylpheed to -claws because I find those extra bells and
> whistles of -claws just irritating.
Sylpheed is solid for me, too in GNOME (Sid). Using it as an IMAP
client.
--
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Ron Johnson, Jr.
Jefferson, LA USA
"I have created a government of whirled peas..."
Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, 12-May-2002, CNN, Larry King Live
Reply to: