[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Sylpheed vs. Claws (was Re: thunderbird -> kmail)

On Thu, Apr 13, 2006 at 06:57:35AM -0700, Rodney D. Myers wrote:
> > > 2 separate programs now.
> > 
> > Ah, ok.  What's the benefit of -claws, or the difference?
> > 
> > -- 
> > -----------------------------------------------------------------
> > Ron Johnson, Jr.
> > Jefferson, LA USA
> >
> Now therein lies a very good question. I have never used sylpheed,
> always SC. It had more features from the beginning, and was trying
> different approaches to things.

fwiw, I just dumped sylpheed the other day as I got tired of it
randomly crashing. especially when switching from one folder to
another. I know sylpheed is undergoing a lot of developement (spent a
few days on their list) and the main dev. is pretty responsive. It
used to crash on me about two or three times a day. no big deal, just
annoying. but I'm moving to WMII and a text based client works much
better in that environment (mutt).


> -- 
> Rodney D. Myers <rdmyers.42@gmail.com>	
> Registered Linux User #96112
> ICQ#:     AIM#:       YAHOO:
> 18002350  mailman452  mailman42_5
> They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a 
> little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
>         Ben Franklin - 1759

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: