[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: just a little OT: online meeting coordinator sought



also sprach Kevin Mark <kmark+debian-user@pipeline.com> [2006.02.24.0341 +0100]:
> A=list of people
> B=1/2 hr time slots that all people can meet
> C=number of contigous time slots for meeting
> D=combinations of B that can satisfy C, where D < B
> E=D where all people can attend, where E < D

He, looks good.

> then what to do if E contains say 2 time slots, where slot1 total score
> is say 2 and slot2 total score is 12
> 
> need 1 hour for meeting
> 2006-02-20:1000-1030: total 2
> 2006-02-20:1030-1100: total 12
> should you schedule the meeting for 1000-1100?

If that is the best choice, yes. I suppose this is case where
individual importance comes in. If e.g. the project leader cannot
make 1000 but 1030, maybe it's not a good choice; if just "some
others" aren't there the first half, that's okay.

Maybe it's too much to ask the tool to make a decision. Maybe it
could just give a list of possibilities, sorted by the sum of
products of attendants and their importance, and list the actual
attendants and missing people for each to let someone make the
decision?

-- 
Please do not send copies of list mail to me; I read the list!
 
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer and author: http://debiansystem.info
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
 
Invalid/expired PGP (sub)keys? Use subkeys.pgp.net as keyserver!
 
it is better to have loft and lost
than to never have loft at all.
                                                       -- groucho marx

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature (GPG/PGP)


Reply to: