Re: LVM and Windows

To: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: LVM and Windows
From: Daniel Johnson <teknotus@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:06:15 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] ec0b5e080507260806664619d5@mail.gmail.com>
Reply-to: Daniel Johnson <teknotus@gmail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20050725002458.GA13033@pooq.com>
References: <[🔎] 20050723175300.GA23558@pooq.com> <[🔎] 20050723184325.GA13426@masterpost> <[🔎] 20050723210810.GA29417@pooq.com> <[🔎] 20050724032658.GA16635@intergate.com> <[🔎] 20050725002458.GA13033@pooq.com>

> It contains equivalent functionality to LVM and more.

It makes me wonder whether it actually uses LVM, or has an independent
implementation.

>From my understanding at one point they were competing technologies, and used different kernel modifications to achieve their goals, but now they are cooperating.

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: LVM and Windows
  - From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com>

References:
- LVM and Windows
  - From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com>
- Re: LVM and Windows
  - From: mess-mate <messmate@free.fr>
- Re: LVM and Windows
  - From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com>
- Re: LVM and Windows
  - From: Wayne Topa <linuxone@intergate.com>
- Re: LVM and Windows
  - From: Hendrik Boom <hendrik@pooq.com>

Prev by Date: Re: OT: In defence of ``newbie-picking'' (was:Re: MS Project 2003)
Next by Date: Re: OT: In defence of ``newbie-picking'' (was:Re: MS Project 2003)
Previous by thread: Re: LVM and Windows
Next by thread: Re: LVM and Windows
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread