Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
On Feb 09 2005, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 12:57 -0200, Rogério Brito wrote:
> > And that's not to mention anything about the CPU load, which on slower
> > systems, means quite a lot.
>
> Do you mean that USB uses more CPU?
In the few cases that I've seen, yes.
--
Learn to quote e-mails decently at:
http://pub.tsn.dk/how-to-quote.php
http://learn.to/quote
http://www.xs4all.nl/~sbpoley/toppost.htm
Reply to:
- References:
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Tom Vier <tmv@comcast.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@debian.org>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Rogério Brito <rbrito@ime.usp.br>
- Re: Sarge with ext3, reiserfs (3/4?) or xfs?
- From: Ron Johnson <ron.l.johnson@cox.net>