* Nunya (31210.nospam@comcast.net) [031211 02:40]: > On Thu, Dec 11, 2003 at 12:38:03AM -0500, ScruLoose wrote: > > AFAIK, mutt cannot be made to actually issue a prompt in any of these > > cases. So I guess if you really _really_ want to be prompted (instead of > > just using the appropriate command in the first place) then you are > > trying to make mutt do something outside its usual behaviour after all. > > Thanks for the reply. Yes, I was wishing for Mutt to help me out > instead of making me cogitate "which is appropriate here" when it's > usually clear from context. (In particular the choice between <g> in > Inbox and <l> for Lists. I never want the <g> behavior for Lists, and > <l> does nothing for non-lists). I'll ask on mutt-users. Assuming you have your list mail delivered into folders beneath =lists: folder-hook . 'bind index g group-reply' folder-hook . 'bind pager g group-reply' folder-hook =lists 'bind index g list-reply' folder-hook =lists 'bind pager g list-reply' good times, Vineet -- http://www.doorstop.net/ -- http://www.aclu.org/ It's all about Freedom.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature