Re: A newbie's confusion about GPL
On Sun, 19 Oct 2003 16:59:08 -0400,
Bijan Soleymani <bijan@psq.com> wrote in message
<[🔎] 20031019205908.GA11299@server.crasseux.com>:
> On Sun, Oct 19, 2003 at 01:07:12AM -0700, Tom wrote:
..really? ;-)
> > > ..as in; "Where _is_ Osama and Saddam?". And playing the
> > > "west bank settler" games on the Iraqis, is _not_ gonna help.
> By waging war on Iraq when there was no clear link between Iraq and Al
> Quaeda and when there was no clear evidence of weapons of mass
> destruction, the U.S. wanted to show that they can wage war without
> even making up semi-coherent reasons. I mean Bush kept
> flip-flopping:
> This is about weapons of mass destruction,
> then
> This is about terrorism
> then
> This is about regime change
..the removal of _any_ "terrorist" war criminal regime
is a requirement to _any_ legal regime: Check out
"Art. 85 Repression of breaches of this Protocol",
"Art. 86 Failure to act",
"Art. 87 Duty of commanders",
"Art. 88 Mutual assistance in criminal matters",
"Art. 89 Co-operation" and
"Art. 90 International Fact-Finding Commission" of
http://www.icrc.org/ihl.nsf/WebCONVART?OpenView&Start=1&Count=150&Expand=5#5
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: