Re: OT: Martin Krafft - mail bouncing
Christoph Simon writes:
> One thing is to double prices and expose them _before_ you pay, and
> another thing is to double prices you suddenly have to pay in
> disagreement with a former contract. Maybe you are a lawyer, but for my
> taste, these things stink like hell.
That's got nothing to do with the monopoly question.
> Personally, I can't understand what is legal if two parties agree to a
> set of conditions, that one part can change these conditions arbitrarily,
> leaving the other with the choices of not getting any service or
> accepting the abuse.
Sounds like a contract dispute. Don't you have any civil courts?
> Maybe this is legal, but it stinks. I can't do that. Telefónica can.
That's not monopoly. That's corruption.
--
John Hasler
john@dhh.gt.org (John Hasler)
Dancing Horse Hill
Elmwood, WI
Reply to: