[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

OT: Martin Krafft - mail bouncing



Martin:

Your spam blocking is bouncing my mail:

----- Forwarded message from Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@guildenstern.dyndns.org> -----

Received: from mail by ganymede.tranquillity.lan with spam-scanned (Exim 4.22)
	id 1A0u2r-0006SS-AP
	for karsten@guildenstern.dyndns.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:33:59 +0100
Received: from mail by ganymede.tranquillity.lan with local (Exim 4.22)
	id 1A0u2q-0006SP-Fq
	for karsten@guildenstern.dyndns.org; Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:33:52 +0100
X-Failed-Recipients: madduck+debian@madduck.net
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
From: Mail Delivery System <Mailer-Daemon@guildenstern.dyndns.org>
To: karsten@guildenstern.dyndns.org
Subject: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender
Message-Id: <E1A0u2q-0006SP-Fq@ganymede.tranquillity.lan>
Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2003 03:33:52 +0100
X-Mozilla-Status: 0004
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.4 required=5.0
	tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,PGP_SIGNATURE,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
	autolearn=ham version=2.55
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.55 (1.174.2.19-2003-05-19-exp)

This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  madduck+debian@madduck.net
    SMTP error from remote mailer after RCPT TO:<madduck+debian@madduck.net>:
    host a.mx.madduck.net [130.60.73.144]: 554 Service unavailable; [81.108.149.163] blocked using dynablock.easynet.nl, reason:
    Dynamic/Residential IP range listed by easynet.nl DynaBlock - http://dynablock.easynet.nl/errors.html

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

<...>

-- 
Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com>        http://kmself.home.netcom.com/
 What Part of "Gestalt" don't you understand?
   The golden rule of technical design:  complexity is the enemy.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: