Re: OT: why I don't want CCs
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 11:48:19PM -0700, Steve Lamb wrote:
> > Explain what validates said non-issues?
>
> Uhm, no. I have explained them already. The onus is on you to explain
> why they are nothing more than paranoid and not valid concerns and problems.
You never gave any explaination at all as to why they would be an
issue, just made a paranoid statement that everybody flat dismissed
and claimed it as fact.
> Note the use of past and present tense in regards to the role of SMTP.
> When the relevant RFCs acknowledge that use what leg do you have to stand on?
> Are you about to claim the RFCs are wrong and should be ignored. If so may I
> ask whom gets to choose which RFCs are correct, which are not and when to
> adhere and ignore?
Those aren't standards yet. And the only thing I see there is an
awknowledgement that there are mailers currently in use that do the
wrong thing, not that it's the right thing to do.
- --
.''`. Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.ca>
: :' : proud Debian admin and user
`. `'`
`- Debian - when you have better things to do than fix a system
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE/GOwxJ5vLSqVpK2kRAvRoAJ4vkJsZOLiDZbCc6MPeh5sRP/9M8ACfTsj4
7isRjY+RkQ535OSfrx9fCnU=
=QUKv
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: