Re: kernel-source versus kernel-patch

To: Vineet Kumar <debian-user@virtual.doorstop.net>
Cc: debian-user@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: kernel-source versus kernel-patch
From: Ismael Valladolid Torres <ismael@sambara.org>
Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 23:02:05 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 3F131A4D.6020504@sambara.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20030714181018.GD13415@doorstop.net>
References: <[🔎] 3F12EEED.7000402@sambara.org> <[🔎] 20030714181018.GD13415@doorstop.net>

Vineet Kumar escribio el 14/07/03 20:10:

Debian's kernel-source package does include the debian patches.  The
description of kernel-patch-debian-2.4.21 says it should be applied to
"pristine" kernel source, meaning an unpatched tarball from kernel.org.


Now it seems logical. Thanks a lot.

Regards, Ismael

Reply to:

References:
- kernel-source versus kernel-patch
  - From: Ismael Valladolid Torres <ismael@sambara.org>
- Re: kernel-source versus kernel-patch
  - From: Vineet Kumar <debian-user@virtual.doorstop.net>

Prev by Date: Building FVWM 2.5.7 for Debian testing / Gnome 2
Next by Date: Re: TCP/IP printing under Debian
Previous by thread: Re: kernel-source versus kernel-patch
Next by thread: compile and install custom patched debian kernel
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread