Re: What's going on with Gnome in "testing"?
On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 07:12:41PM -0500, Ron Johnson wrote:
> On Mon, 2003-06-23 at 14:55, stan wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 02:04:03PM -0500, Michael Heironimus wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2003 at 01:00:38PM -0400, stan wrote:
> [snip]
> > The panel applets are a key part of why I use Gnome. My panel (on the
> > bottom) is slap full. Let's see, on this machine from left to right, I've
> > got, The Foot, X Terminal weather, clock, Gnome terminal, help, Galeon, CPU
> > load, x eyes, dictionary look up, battery monitor, XMMS, CD player,
> >
> > Last time I looked, most of these were not available in Gnome 2.
> >
> > I have almost no icons on the desktop, which seems to be Gnome 2's preferred
> > (only ?) way of invoking most things.
> >
> > Am I alone here?
>
> I also like The Panel, and never use desktop icons on my Gnome 2.2
> system. In fact, I disable Nautilus...
Well of course, that's a given.
>
> On my panel, I have
> Geyes 2.2.2
> Weather Report 2.2.2
> The Foot
> Clock 2.2.2
> Icons to start up apps like Evo, Moz, OOo, XCDRoast & GnomeTerm
>
> The complete(?) list of applets in gnome-applets 2.2.1 :
> Battstat
> CD player
> Character Palette
> Command line
> Drivemount
> Geyes
> Keyboard Layout Switcher
> Modemlights
> Stock ticker
> System monitor
> Volume control
> Weather report
> Wireless
Hmm, I'm at home now. Given that list I'd be missing:
Dictonary lookup
CPU load
Slashapp
And I use a different clock than the standard one.
This is a _very_ weak looking list of choices.
Is this on purpose? Gnoem 2.x has been out a _long_ time for this to be all
that;s avaiable.
I vote for keeping both avaialble. I do still have Gnome crashes, but I've
just tared off my ~/.gno* directries, and when they happen, I just relaod
from the tar file.
I'd rather put up with that, thna lose functionality. Although in a perfect
world, I would not have to fo either :-(
--
"They that would give up essential liberty for temporary safety deserve
neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Reply to: