[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: kmail vs. mutt (was: More detailed post ...)

also sprach Paul Johnson <baloo@ursine.dyndns.org> [2003.02.10.1628 +0100]:
> It makes the claim that it is.  The functionality is remarkably
> similar, reminds me of mutt done topheavy or Outlook if it weren't
> designed by idiots.

As of version 3 I take it? Because 2.2.2 is definitely no mutt

Please do not CC me when replying to lists that I read!
 .''`.     martin f. krafft <madduck@debian.org>
: :'  :    proud Debian developer, admin, and user
`. `'`
  `-  Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing a system
NOTE: The pgp.net keyservers and their mirrors are broken!
Get my key here: http://people.debian.org/~madduck/gpg/330c4a75.asc

Attachment: pgpVt2sHxOUJf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: