Re: 2.5.50 on Woody
Gary Turner wrote:
<arief didn't attribute this level?>
Sorry, not quite clear of your meant here.
Given all the dangers alluded to, my curiosity is giving me fits. Just
why do you need/want the 2.5.x kernel? Why not the 2.4 or even the 2.2?
If you said, I missed it (my bad).
Simple, Just for fun. :-)
Actually, I just like to learn it.
Learning Linux Kernel is one of my next TODO in this
lifetime :-) Of course you wouldn't mind that, will you?
Actually I can say this (but I wont):
I spot on kerneltrap.org people say that there's so much
enhancements in this kernel series. Given that 2.4.x already
give me good statistics, I like to know what's new.
So far, I've feel much fun, getting to know you guys, gets
some nice advices, new experience, just corrected some minor
typo in a few source files, and some trivial fix on few
programming error, learn a couple of things in
Documentations, know a little about using make-kpkg,
I have this little wonder why is my other question on
Callback Server didn't get any response...