on Wed, 20 Nov 2002 06:25:57PM -0500, Derrick 'dman' Hudson insinuated:
> On Sun, Nov 17, 2002 at 01:58:28PM -0500, Nori Heikkinen wrote:
>
> | really? i've been beating my head against this for a while now, and
> | have to date only managed to get dark-blue-and-pink syntax
> | highlighting on the Suns i work on ... exporting TERM=dtterm doesn't
> | seem to do much, either. do i need to rewrite my syntax highlighting
> | configuration files, or something? any tips on this would be greatly
> | appreciated!
>
> If you use a dark (black) background in your terminal like I do, then
> put
> set bg=dark
> syn on
> in your .vimrc. Then vim will use lighter colors for the
> highlighting. If you want gvim's gui to match, add
> hi Normal guibg=black guifg=white
> before the 'syn on' line.
>
> The problem with using TERM=xterm on Solaris is that all you get is
> bold and underlines for "highlighting" because programs will think
> your terminal doesn't have any color support on it.
right, that's exactly my problem. so you too are saying it should be
dtterm? or xtermc? nothing i export my TERM to seems to make any
difference at all.
</nori>
--
.~. nori @ sccs.swarthmore.edu
/V\ http://www.sccs.swarthmore.edu/~nori/jnl/
// \\ @ maenad.net
/( )\ www.maenad.net
^`~'^
Attachment:
pgpE0QNAkuj_o.pgp
Description: PGP signature