Re: The implications of installing from the unstable release
In message <[🔎] 20020721111123.1fcc127b.csousa@tvtel.pt>
Carlos Sousa <csousa@tvtel.pt> wrote:
[snip]
> I don't pretend to fully understand the apt pinning mechanism, but if
> you would like to insure that you don't get packages from unstable
> accidentally then you should give it a priority less than 100. You can
> always get packages from there with apt-get -t unstable.
Ah, I see. I was wondering how you assigned those priority numbers. I now
have unstable set to 50 so with any luck that will have solved the problem.
--
(\/)atthew )-(ambley ---------------\ If something's worth doing it's worth
E-mail : matthew@aether.demon.co.uk \ doing badly until you can learn to
Public key : C487AC52 \ do it well.
Web : http://www.aether.demon.co.uk/ \-----------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: