[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Biblatex



Hey Manuel,

On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 11:19:04PM +0200, Manuel Pégourié-Gonnard wrote:
> For your information, after discussion we decided not to include biblatex in
> the next TL release (2008), since after asking the author, he said he'd prefer
> that we don't. (As you may know, though it is of course free software, the is
> a notice in the README kindly asking TeX distributors to refrain from
> packaging it before version 1.0).
> 
> The main reasons of the author (quoting from memory) are:
> - Don't fix a development version on DVD.
> - Don't increase the user base too widely for now, since the project is still
> in development phase and he thinks spending to much time on user support at
> this early stage would take his time and finally hurt the project.
> 
> While the first reason no longer hold for Debian (the package would be in sid,
> and testing after Lenny release, so only installed by those who update
> regularly), the second one may still hold.
> 
> I don't know what is the best thing to do. I'm under the impression that the
> user base is already quite large anyway (I no longer use bibtex w/o biblatex
> myself) but probably the barrier of installing it limits the user base to
> "more-than-average" users?

Under these circumstances I'd consider experimental the right place for
it (or maybe already sid now).

> I assume the reason is, texlive-* packages in debian are updated from TL and
> not from CTAN (this is TL's job...) So csquotes is still the same version as
> in TL2007 (the no-for-very-longer current release). TL'08 ships v4.2 (where
> did you see that current version on CTAN is 4.1? I doubt we took our version
> from anywhere else that CTAN).

I see the system... :) I found 4.1 at [1].

Thanks for your time so far!

Cheers,
Hauke

[1] http://tug.ctan.org/cgi-bin/ctanPackageInformation.py?id=csquotes

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: