Re: Too many conflicts? (tetex vs. texlive)
Frank Küster <frank@debian.org> wrote:
> I don't understand why the ls-R links should be needed; but even if they
Well, I don't know either. I didn't know what the "take over" precisely
meant in Norbert's changelog snipped, but I simply trusted him to better
than I on the subject. Anyway, it is not useful to discuss this any
longer since you agree that the unversioned dependency is acceptable...
> are I think a "Depends: tex-common" is probably enough, especially since
> tex-common_0.7 is already in testing. If we get any complaints, we can
> always add the stricter advice later.
OK, so Policy doesn't has to be changed on this point.
--
Florent
Reply to: