Re: Too many conflicts? (tetex vs. texlive)
Florent Rougon <f.rougon@free.fr> wrote:
> Norbert Preining <preining@logic.at> wrote:
>
>> tex-common (0.7) unstable; urgency=low
>>
>> * take over installation of /var/cache/fonts/*, /usr/local/share/texmf
>> and the ls-R links from tetex (and texlive). [preining]
>
> Ooookay. However, since all this never hit unstable yet, we are pretty
> much free IMHO. If readability of dep lines is deemed more important,
> the version part of the dependency can be ommited (for now---until we do
> require a specific version uploaded to unstable, of course). Frank?
I don't understand why the ls-R links should be needed; but even if they
are I think a "Depends: tex-common" is probably enough, especially since
tex-common_0.7 is already in testing. If we get any complaints, we can
always add the stricter advice later.
Regards, Frank
--
Frank Küster
Inst. f. Biochemie der Univ. Zürich
Debian Developer
Reply to: