[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Booting an LDOM (can't find kernel)



Just try with "console=ttyS0". systemd reads this parameter from the kernel command line and sets up the proper getty.

The systemd documentation has lots of information on that.

On Jul 26, 2016, at 11:37 PM, alexmcwhirter@triadic.us wrote:

On 2016-07-26 17:31, alexmcwhirter@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 17:25, alexmcwhirter@triadic.us wrote:
On 2016-07-26 17:15, John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
Perhaps both are panicing? In this situation it seems that systemd,
initramfs, etc... are all on one console and the kernel messages are
on another. I.E. kernel messages are on ttyS0 and everything else is
on tty0 (whatever tty0 is).
Come to think of it, my t5120 shows a similar behavior. Booting
without console=ttyS0 i can see all kernel messages and systemd /
initramfs messages, but no login prompt. If i boot with console=ttyS0
i can see kernel messages, and eventually get a login prompt, but all
systemd / initramfs messages are missing.
It seems the same issue is being experienced here, but init is dying
before the login prompt can start. With console=ttyS0 we loose the
systemd messages, and without it systemd seems to move to the wrong
tty before panicing as we loose all output before a panic.
The real question is why initramfs / systemd aren't sending output to
ttyS0 when console=ttyS0 is specified. Is...
[244919.084723] Warning: unable to open an initial console.
indicating that systemd can't attach to ttyS0 for whatever reason?
And further more, what is tty0? Why is systemd starting getty with no
video card. Sun4U machines do not start getty; does the ldom provide a
virtual vga console?
Meh, i take that back. Sun4U boxes do start getty. The question is
what is tty0 and why is systemd attaching to it over ttyS0 where as on
sun4u it chooses to attach to ttyS0.

I need to lay off the coffee, i sometimes type too fast for my own good...

<snip> and why is getty attaching to it over ttyS0 </snip>

Reply to: