Hi Eric, On Sat, Mar 26, 2022 at 12:20:59PM -0400, Eric Brown wrote: > > I will try to update the package and see. If it's not too much work, I'll push an update. > > Great thanks, and I'd be happy to test again. I have updated to the latest version and pushed to my personal repo. I did not get the the time to test examples, and hence it'd be great if you could test+troubleshoot if something is missing. @All, I renamed shiny-server to node-shiny-server as source package name, binary package name is still shiny-server. This is done to not diverge from JS team conventions. The repo can be found at: https://salsa.debian.org/science-team/node-shiny-server/ > I'm also hoping to try to build and test in ARM. I think having > shiny-server in ARM, for e.g. hosting on a Raspberry pi, would be > hugely valuable, as there is currently no straightforward way for > users but for many use cases it could be ideal. Actually debian supports a bunch of architectures; So whenever the package is accepted, it'd also build on both armhf and arm64, so hopefully that'd easily make it available to users. Regards, Nilesh
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature