Re: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
Hi,
There is not really a well thought out reason for maintaining it in
the Debian Science team.
I arrived at these mobile packages via software-radio packages such as
"osmo-trx", which I sort of consider science. Getting to libosmocore,
we are getting higher in the OSI model, and suddenly it becomes more
of production environment applications.
I guess I was just thinking that most of my other packages have been
science packages, I am in the Science team, and there are friendly
sponsors interested in these packages also in the Science team. Also,
where to draw the line between science and not science is not very
clear.. A third reason is that I have been told that it is better to
maintain packages in teams, and of those teams in which I am a member,
Debian Science was the only one that vaguely could fit.
Cheers
Ruben
2017-02-11 19:03 GMT+01:00 Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 02:13:49PM +0100, Thorsten Alteholz wrote:
>> On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:
>> >I admit I have no idea why this is maintained inside Debian Science.
>>
>> As I have similar packages in the pipeline, I was wondering as well whether
>> Debian Science should be their new home. Maybe this is a good opportunitiy
>> to start an own mobile team?
>
> As I said there is no point in beeing exclusive but I think newcomers
> who might also intend to package some mobile applications might fail to
> find their potential team mates "hidden" in Debian Science team. If
> you ask me I think a Debian mobile team is a pretty good idea - it could
> even use the Blends framework to categorise their packages.
>
> I'd really welcome if you would create such a team.
>
> Kind regards
>
> Andreas.
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: