Re: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?

To: Debian Science List <debian-science@lists.debian.org>
Cc: Ruben Undheim <ruben.undheim@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
From: Thorsten Alteholz <alteholz@debian.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2017 14:13:49 +0100 (CET)
Message-id: <[🔎] alpine.DEB.2.02.1702111404470.26749@jupiter.server.alteholz.net>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20170210153709.GD25184@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 20170210153709.GD25184@an3as.eu>



On Fri, 10 Feb 2017, Andreas Tille wrote:

I admit I have no idea why this is maintained inside Debian Science.

As I have similar packages in the pipeline, I was wondering as wellwhether Debian Science should be their new home. Maybe this is a goodopportunitiy to start an own mobile team?


  Thorsten

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

References:
- Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Re: Sundials is way outdated
Next by Date: RFS: pybind11/2.0.1-2
Previous by thread: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
Next by thread: Re: Why is libosmocore maintained in Debian Science?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread