Re: RFS: ruby-ncursesw 1.3.1-1
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Per Andersson <avtobiff@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> What about the transition from ruby-ncurses to ruby-ncursesw? Should
> ruby-ncursesw just provide ruby-ncurses or should there be a also be
> conflicts in there? From what I can tell ruby-ncursesw should provide
> ruby-ncurses and conflict ruby-ncurses (if that is at all possible).
As I understood from Policy 7.6.2 ruby-ncursesw should
Provides: ruby-ncurses
Conflicts: ruby-ncurses
Replaces: ruby-ncurses
I base this upon the fact that
a) ruby-ncursesw should replace ruby-ncurses, and,
b) ruby-ncursesw and ruby-ncurses both install
/usr/lib/ruby/vendor_ruby/ncurses.rb.
When we have reached a decision I can contact the tpp mantainer
about the transition.
Best,
Per
Reply to: