Per Andersson escreveu isso aí: > Hi! > > After asking Gaudenz about sponsoring ruby-ncursesw (and sup-mail) I was > pointed at #477366 and asked if a separate source package really was > necessary (perl ncurses apparently links against ncursesw). > > So I made a few attempts to having ruby-ncursesw also build ruby-ncurses, > upstream is same but source is slightly different. > > In the end I figured that it is probably enough to symlink > > lib/ncurses.rb -> lib/ncursesw.rb > > and let ruby-ncursesw Provides: ruby-ncurses. > > This would make both Ruby's ncurses and ncursesw use ncursesw\_bin, > which is linked against ncursesw, so both would have wide character support. > > Is this a sufficient solution? If so merger with ruby-ncurses (mostly, > transition packages) could be performed and then ruby-ncurses source > package could be removed. If ruby-ncursesw supports everything that ruby-ncurses supports, than I think we should go fo it. Since ruby-ncurses has few reverse dependencies, it should be ok. Could you please also test tpp (the other rdep besides sup-mail) with ruby-ncursesw? The only comment I have regarding the packaging is that you don't need multiple entries in debian/changelog package was not uploaded yet. You can condense everything as a single entry for version 1.3.1-1, and you don't need to list the changes between these non-uploaded versions, since users of the package don't care about that. -- Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature