Re: RFS: kramdown
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 9:34 PM, Vincent Fourmond <fourmond@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 8:06 PM, Vincent Fourmond <fourmond@debian.org> wrote:
>>>> I think Vincent suggested the other way around: name the single package
>>>> ruby-kramdown, since it is more likely to be used as a *library* instead
>>>> of an application. This will also make it consistent with the other
>>>> similar packages such as ruby-bluecloth, ruby-redcloth, ruby-rdiscount,
>>>> ...
>>>
>>> Ok. I rename this package "ruby-kramdown", and remove kramdown.git,
>>> make ruby-kramdown.git.
>>
>> Great, I'll have a look at that tomorrow evening (UTC+0200).
>
> It's on its way.
Hmmm. It seems it got lost somehow... Don't forget to set the suite
to unstable and not UNRELEASED ;-)... Unfortunately, building now
fails with the following problem:
Finished tests in 2.420905s, 306.4970 tests/s, 30097.0106 assertions/s.
1) Failure:
test_/tmp/buildd/ruby-kramdown-0_13_5/test/testcases/block/12_extension/options3_text_to_html(TestFiles)
[/tmp/buildd/ruby-kramdown-0.13.5/test/test_files.rb:45]:
<"<div><span class=\"CodeRay\">x = <span
class=\"co\">Class</span>.new\n</span>\n</div>\n\n<div><span
class=\"CodeRay\">x = <span
class=\"co\">Class</span>.new\n</span>\n</div>\n"> expected but was
<"<div><span class=\"CodeRay\">x = <span
class=\"constant\">Class</span>.new\n</span>\n</div>\n\n<div><span
class=\"CodeRay\">x = <span
class=\"constant\">Class</span>.new\n</span>\n</div>\n">.
Can you please have a look ?
Cheers,
Vincent
Reply to: