Re: BIND 8 deprecation for the release notes
Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
>> Sure, but python2.5 is not really usable: almost all the python modules a=
> re
>> compiled only for python2.4. For postgresql you are right and I'm wrong,
>> but I suppose that there are other examples in the archive where the only=
> a
>> major release is released.
>>=20
>> Anyway, my question still applies. :)
>>=20
> That got me wondering and it appears that Etch will ship with Apache
> 1.3.34? Why? It is considered a legacy release by ASF? Is the Debian
> security team really willing to support it for another 2-3 years?
I've asked for reasons to still ship Apache 1.3 a few months ago and
only received a vague "it still has it's use". I'm still curious why
it's needed. The same goes for bind8, only that I didn't receive a
sustantial reply at all...
Reply to: