[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mpich C++ transition status



On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 10:34:14PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> writes:
> > On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:23:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:

> >> It just occurred to me, from following previous transitions... lam also
> >> has not yet been built on m68k.  Does that mean that the above three
> >> source packages should wait on uploading new versions until lam has
> >> been built on all platforms, to make sure that the rebuild gets the
> >> right library version?

> > Yes, unless you set a versioned build dependency, uploading now just
> > means you'll have to do it again later.

> The build of lam has now failed on m68k, which I'm afraid is going to
> impact this transition (not that it's ready to go yet, but this will
> definitely have to be dealt with before it can happen, and before even
> some packages can be built properly, including netpipe).

> devel/lam_7.1.1-3.2: Failed by buildd_m68k-tanda [extra:out-of-date]
>   Reasons for failing:
>     [Category: none]
>     >  m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I../../share/include -I../../share/include -DLAM_BUILDING=1 -O3 -pthread -MT ndi_parse.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/ndi_parse.Tpo -c ndi_parse.c -o ndi_parse.o
>     > ndi_parse.c: In function 'ndi_parse1':
>     > ndi_parse.c:241: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
>     > Please submit a full bug report,
>     > with preprocessed source if appropriate.
>     > See <URL:http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs.html> for instructions.
>     > For Debian GNU/Linux specific bug reporting instructions,
>     > see <URL:file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-4.0/README.Bugs>.
>     > make[3]: *** [ndi_parse.lo] Error 1

> Not sure whether it would be best to do another upload of lam,
> decreasing optimization for m68k, or if this is an addressable
> toolchain issue.

I'm sure it's addressable, but I don't think there's any sort of ETA yet
for this particular m68k bug.  I think we're much better off getting lam
to use -O2 instead of -O3 here.

Cheers,
-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: