[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: mpich C++ transition status



On Fri, Sep 09, 2005 at 09:23:15PM -0700, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
> > Source: rmpi
> > Source: xmpi
> > Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)

> > Thankfully, libxmpi4 doesn't pull in anything else.  I'll add the above
> > packages to the list of ones that need RC bugs filed.

> It just occurred to me, from following previous transitions... lam also
> has not yet been built on m68k.  Does that mean that the above three
> source packages should wait on uploading new versions until lam has been
> built on all platforms, to make sure that the rebuild gets the right
> library version?

Yes, unless you set a versioned build dependency, uploading now just
means you'll have to do it again later.

-- 
Steve Langasek                   Give me a lever long enough and a Free OS
Debian Developer                   to set it on, and I can move the world.
vorlon@debian.org                                   http://www.debian.org/

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: