Re: Linux 2.6.12-6 uploaded and built on all arches, waiting testing migration and futur upload plan.
On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 05:56:38PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2005 at 04:59:54PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
> > http://www.debian.org/devel/testing :
> >
> > 2. It must be compiled and up to date on all architectures it has previously
> > been compiled for in unstable;
>
> Mmm, so not only adding new binary packages, but removing them also needs
> manual processing ?
No; removing an _architecture_ requires manual processing.
> Is at least this removal not something that could be automated ? Just
> curious about this one.
It would seem to me that the difference between 'an oversight' and 'an
intentional omission' is hard to automatedly find.
Could be wrong, though.
--
The amount of time between slipping on the peel and landing on the
pavement is precisely one bananosecond
Reply to: