Re: mpich C++ transition status
Russ Allbery <rra@stanford.edu> writes:
> Also, hdf5 depends on lam, which also had to do its own transition, and
> that adds the following additional packages:
> Package: libxmpi4
> Package: netpipe-lam
> Package: r-cran-rmpi
> Package: xmpi
> netpipe is already implicated in other parts of this transition, so the
> additional source packages are:
> Source: rmpi
> Source: xmpi
> Source: clustalw-mpi (non-free)
> Thankfully, libxmpi4 doesn't pull in anything else. I'll add the above
> packages to the list of ones that need RC bugs filed.
It just occurred to me, from following previous transitions... lam also
has not yet been built on m68k. Does that mean that the above three
source packages should wait on uploading new versions until lam has been
built on all platforms, to make sure that the rebuild gets the right
library version?
--
Russ Allbery (rra@stanford.edu) <http://www.eyrie.org/~eagle/>
Reply to: