Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

[Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>]

On 15 May 2005 at 12:26, Steve Langasek wrote:
| On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:21:53PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| > On 14 May 2005 at 18:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > | > whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
| > | > RQuantLib:
| 
| > | > edd@homebud:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
| > | > libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
| > | > libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
| > | > edd@homebud:~>                                    
| 
| > | > That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?
| 
| > | Yes, it does.
| 
| > New quantlib 0.3.9-2 packages (libquantlib0, libquantlib0-dev,
| > quantlib-example) are on their way now.  
| 
| > I will follow up with new versions of quantlib-ruby, quantlib-python and
| > r-cran-rquantlib by tomorrow to give the autobuilders a chance to prepare
| > 0.3.9-2 which these will depends upon.
| 
| Doh.  All four of these need to be reuploaded?  I thought only
| r-cran-rquantlib was broken..?

Well, look two quotes above where we determined that my shlibs was fscked
(which indeed it was).  Not one of the depending packages had a correct
Depends line due my bad shlibs file.  

I haven't build quantlib-python and quantlib-ruby. If you want, I can skip
the upload but it would be cleaner to rebuild'em.

Regards, Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
         -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'