Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

[Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>]

On 14 May 2005 at 20:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
| 
| On 14 May 2005 at 17:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
| | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8.
| | > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12.  See below for a log.
| | 
| | Ah.  Please fix the missing dependency on quantlib, then, and I'll push it
| | in.
| 
| Yes, I will look into that and let you know when I have a working copy.

Found the problem. I guess I missed the boot when QL upstream decided to go
to 'versioned' libraries:

edd@homebud:~> ldd /usr/bin/SwapValuation
        libQuantLib-0.3.9.so => /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.9.so (0x4002a000)
	[...]

whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
RQuantLib:

edd@homebud:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
edd@homebud:~>                                    

That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?

Dirk

-- 
An economist is an expert who will know tomorrow why the things he 
predicted yesterday didn't happen today.  --  Laurence J. Peter