Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>]

On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:19:17PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> On 14 May 2005 at 20:04, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> | 
> | On 14 May 2005 at 17:45, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | | > I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8.
> | | > Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12.  See below for a log.
> | | 
> | | Ah.  Please fix the missing dependency on quantlib, then, and I'll push it
> | | in.
> | 
> | Yes, I will look into that and let you know when I have a working copy.

> Found the problem. I guess I missed the boot when QL upstream decided to go
> to 'versioned' libraries:

> edd@homebud:~> ldd /usr/bin/SwapValuation
>         libQuantLib-0.3.9.so => /usr/lib/libQuantLib-0.3.9.so (0x4002a000)
> 	[...]

> whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
> RQuantLib:

> edd@homebud:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
> libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
> libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
> edd@homebud:~>                                    

> That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?

Yes, it does.

Thanks,
-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature