Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

[Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>]

On 14 May 2005 at 18:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
| > whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
| > RQuantLib:
| 
| > edd@homebud:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
| > libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
| > libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
| > edd@homebud:~>                                    
| 
| > That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?
| 
| Yes, it does.

New quantlib 0.3.9-2 packages (libquantlib0, libquantlib0-dev,
quantlib-example) are on their way now.  

I will follow up with new versions of quantlib-ruby, quantlib-python and
r-cran-rquantlib by tomorrow to give the autobuilders a chance to prepare
0.3.9-2 which these will depends upon.

Thanks, Dirk

-- 
Statistics: The (futile) attempt to offer certainty about uncertainty.
         -- Roger Koenker, 'Dictionary of Received Ideas of Statistics'