Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
On Sat, May 14, 2005 at 08:12:54AM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> I guess I wasn't sufficiently clear. 0.1.11 is _broken_ as it needs QL 0.3.8.
> Given that we settled on QL 0.3.9 we do need 0.1.12. See below for a log.
Why isn't this reflected in the dependencies then? Dependencies are
there to reflect which versions of packages work together with which
other package's versions.
Why doesn't r-cran-rquantlib even depend on quantlib? According to the
error you quoted, r-cran-rquantlib doesn't seem to work at all with a
wrong quantlib version, I assume it wouldn't work either without any
quantlib version?
> There is, it's just that nobody has a critical bug yet.
It's a bit hard to squash release critical issues if they aren't even
filed as bugs, don't you think?
--Jeroen
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
Jeroen@wolffelaar.nl (also for Jabber & MSN; ICQ: 33944357)
http://Jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
Reply to:
- References:
- Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>
- Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
- From: Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>
- Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing
- From: Dirk Eddelbuettel <edd@debian.org>