Re: Please consider quantlib_0.3.9 (and -ruby,-python,-doc) for testing

[Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org>]

On Sun, May 15, 2005 at 02:21:53PM -0500, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:

> On 14 May 2005 at 18:44, Steve Langasek wrote:
> | > whereas my shlibs is unversioned, hence the mismatch/lack of entry for
> | > RQuantLib:

> | > edd@homebud:~> cat /var/lib/dpkg/info/libquantlib0.shlibs
> | > libQuantLib 0 libquantlib0
> | > libQuantLibFunctions 0 libquantlib0
> | > edd@homebud:~>                                    

> | > That warrants a new libquantlib0 release, doesn't it?

> | Yes, it does.

> New quantlib 0.3.9-2 packages (libquantlib0, libquantlib0-dev,
> quantlib-example) are on their way now.  

> I will follow up with new versions of quantlib-ruby, quantlib-python and
> r-cran-rquantlib by tomorrow to give the autobuilders a chance to prepare
> 0.3.9-2 which these will depends upon.

Doh.  All four of these need to be reuploaded?  I thought only
r-cran-rquantlib was broken..?

-- 
Steve Langasek
postmodern programmer

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature