On 07-02-13 07:03, Graham Inggs wrote: > On 6 February 2013 22:07, Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org > <mailto:elbrus@debian.org>> wrote: > >> I think that if we have the split of -common, it is time to upload >> the package to experimental, to see if the ftp-masters can let the >> new package into main. We can then also start to ask dependent >> package to try out building against motif instead of lesstif2. > > > The only other thing I can think of is splitting libmotif-dev into > libxm4-dev, libmrm4-dev, libuil4-dev Don't you think this is a little overkill? Not that I have a strong objection, but do we really need so many packages? Hmm, looking at e.g. libav, I guess it is not strange. > and a new package for uil (the actual UIL compiler executable and its > man pages) and then leaving the common bits in libmotif-dev. What do > you think? So all in all, seems reasonable. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature