On 03/14/13 07:29, Graham Inggs wrote: > After asking that question I tried to do more reading up symbols, but > I found the information very vague, especially about (optional) > symbols. Out of interest, why are there so many other (optional) > symbols? How did you determine they were optional? There are several *.elist files in the package. All symbols that are exported, but are marked private in those lists, I marked as optional. They should not have be in the symbols file, but unfortunately they are exported anyways. By the way, these elist files seem not to be up-to-date, although the header clearly says it is absolutely necessary :(. > I guess Canonical might have the copyright on the white circle > image, I'll check in the sources of unity-greeter. Ok. > I'm not sure about the four squares, I based that on the look of the > icon for Xterm that is displayed in MWM [1]. If you draw them yourselves, than it is all right. No need to look further for that. > Shall I email upstream now and see if they are interested in support > from the community? Good idea. Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature