Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
On Fri, Feb 12, 2021 at 05:59:12PM +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> On 2021-02-12 16:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> > python3-minimal ≤ python3-core ≤ python3 ≤ python3-full
>
> +1. Exactly how I would understand these names.
I see your point too. I guess python3-full is the way to go then,
but maybe also leave it at that if we don't want to bloat python3
too much (python3 becomes python3-core and python3-full becomes
python3).
--
Valentin
Reply to: