Re: upstream python concerns, python3-full package for bullseye
On 2021-02-12 16:18, Simon McVittie wrote:
> We have a python3 package already. If I saw a python3 package and a
> python3-core package, I would expect that either they're the same thing,
> or python3-core is a smaller and less fully-featured version of python3.
>
> Conversely, we already have a python3-minimal package, and I would expect
> python3-core to be larger and more fully-featured than python3-minimal
> (or maybe the same), because by definition if it's minimal then it's
> the least Python you can have. So:
>
> python3-minimal ≤ python3-core ≤ python3 ≤ python3-full
+1. Exactly how I would understand these names.
Andrius
Reply to: