Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
On Jan 13, 2011, at 04:08 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:
>[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
>> Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
>> at install time, but instead are included in the package.
>
>we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
>symlinks for private modules
Ah, I missed that bit.
-Barry
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Reply to:
- References:
- RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Daniel Stender <daniel@danielstender.com>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
- From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>