Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex

To: debian-python@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
Date: Thu, 13 Jan 2011 16:08:29 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20110113150829.GN31072@piotro.eu>
Mail-followup-to: debian-python@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20110113064045.3f3de930@python.org>
References: <[🔎] 4D2C1D86.3040307@danielstender.com> <[🔎] 20110111100956.GD31072@piotro.eu> <[🔎] 20110113135758.GB3883@jwilk.net> <[🔎] 20110113143306.GM31072@piotro.eu> <[🔎] 20110113064045.3f3de930@python.org>

[Barry Warsaw, 2011-01-13]
> Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
> at install time, but instead are included in the package.

we're talking about private modules here, python-support doesn't create
symlinks for private modules
-- 
Piotr Ożarowski                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer
www.ozarowski.pl          www.griffith.cc           www.debian.org
GPG Fingerprint: 1D2F A898 58DA AF62 1786 2DF7 AEF6 F1A2 A745 7645

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>

References:
- RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Daniel Stender <daniel@danielstender.com>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Jakub Wilk <jwilk@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Piotr Ożarowski <piotr@debian.org>
- Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
  - From: Barry Warsaw <barry@python.org>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
Next by Date: Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
Next by thread: Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread