[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: didjvu, djvusmooth, pybtex



On Jan 13, 2011, at 03:33 PM, Piotr Ożarowski wrote:

>[Jakub Wilk, 2011-01-13]
>> Out of curiosity, how is dh_python2 better thant python-support for  
>> Python applications? (It's a 97% honest question!)
>
>It's not better¹ and it's not worse. I asked to consider it for NEW
>package because I want dh_python2 to be the only helper in Wheezy and
>using pysupport has no advantages over dh_python2 when it comes to
>Python applications (I will ask the same for modules when 2.7 will be
>the only supported Python 2.X version and thus the same will be true for
>Python public modules).

Actually, I think dh_python2 *is* better because the symlinks aren't created
at install time, but instead are included in the package.

>I guess we should decide soon if we want to upgrade my personal goal to
>project's goal or not - so far nobody protested very loudly when I
>mentioned it on this list.

+1

-Barry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: