> On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 9:07 PM, Monty Taylor <monty@inaugust.com> wrote:
> > /me whinges that switching to bzr for packaging in general would be a
> > much nicer thing overall, since then ubuntu downstream is pretty well
> > bzr...
> >
> > (note: I use bzr for all of my other projects, so I have a vested interest)
> >
> > However... _anything_ is an improvement over svn.
>
> Matthias also wrote me offlist, that he either prefers to stay in svn,
> or use bzr, but not git (if I understood well).
>
> The problem with bzr is that it seems to me it is mainly used in
> Ubuntu, but that's about it. Also compare for example the number of
> packages in the respective vcs:
My personal preference ordering would probably be:
hg, bzr, svn, git
--
mithrandi, i Ainil en-Balandor, a faer Ambar
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature