Re: [DONE] wml://News/weekly/2011/14/index.wml
Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
> Justin B Rye wrote:
>> Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
>>> Justin B Rye wrote:
>>>> [...] the following cargo-cult incantation seems to work from my side:
>>>>
>>>> svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/publicity/dpn/en/current
>>>> cd current
>>>> w3m -T text/html index.wml # and invoke an editor
>>>> svn update # and if there are conflicts, give up
>>>> svn -m "COMMENT" commit index.wml
>>>
>>> Do you ever do a check in?
>>>
>>> $ svn ci
>>>
>>> Then your changes will get committed back to the server.
>>
>> No, never; I just follow the above procedure copied from
>> http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute. There's nothing
>> in svn(1), but http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn-book.html seems
>> to say that "ci" is simply an alias for "commit",
>
> Yup, exactly. From the man page for svn; "commit (ci): Send changes
> from your working copy to the repository."
Where in the packaged man page do you see that? See
"http://manpages.debian.net/cgi-bin/man.cgi?query=svn";.
>> so I doubt this is the explanation.
>
> I didn't see a commit step in the work flow you outlined which is
> why I asked. Perhaps you're committing you changes through another
> means? Or perhaps you've missed the commit step (which would explain
> why they're not showing up on the server.)
Did you read the bit where I "svn -m 'COMMENT' commit index.wml"?
> Jeremaih
Oh, now you're just playing troll-the-proofreader :-)
--
JBR - and today's single word in West Greenlandic is:
Atuakkiurtunngurtussaavutit "You should become a writer"
Reply to: