[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [DONE] wml://News/weekly/2011/14/index.wml

On Nov 13, 2011, at 14:21, Justin B Rye wrote:

> Jeremiah C. Foster wrote:
>> Justin B Rye wrote:
>>> David Prévot wrote:
>>>> Thanks to both of you. Justin, I don't know why your commits don't
>>>> end up on [Publicity-commits], but if there is anything you could
>>>> do on your side, even to help debugging, it would be welcome.
>>> I hadn't been aware that they weren't.  Contributing to the DPN is the
>>> only thing I do that goes through a version control system, so it's
>>> possible I've got something misconfigured.  All I know about it is
>>> that the following cargo-cult incantation seems to work from my side:
>>> svn co svn+ssh://svn.debian.org/svn/publicity/dpn/en/current
>>> cd current
>>> w3m -T text/html index.wml # and invoke an editor
>>> svn update # and if there are conflicts, give up
>>> svn -m "COMMENT" commit index.wml
>> Do you ever do a check in?
>> $ svn ci 
>> Then your changes will get committed back to the server.
> No, never; I just follow the above procedure copied from
> http://wiki.debian.org/ProjectNews/HowToContribute.  There's nothing
> in svn(1), but http://svnbook.red-bean.com/en/1.7/svn-book.html seems
> to say that "ci" is simply an alias for "commit",

Yup, exactly. From the man page for svn; "commit (ci): Send changes from your working copy to the repository."

> so I doubt this is
> the explanation.

I didn't see a commit step in the work flow you outlined which is why I asked. Perhaps you're committing you changes through another means? Or perhaps you've missed the commit step (which would explain why they're not showing up on the server.)



Reply to: