Re: Expulsions Policy

["Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo" <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>]

2019-01-06 01:03 Steve Langasek:
> On Sat, Jan 05, 2019 at 06:48:31PM +1000, Russell Stuart wrote:
> > It probably isn't, because that effort you say is so unreasonable - the
> > the DAM actually do it.  Did see read the their private email to the
> > person concerned - that would be it.  This thing you are focusing on,
> > the written justification wasn't the change I was asking for as they
> > mostly do it now.  I was asking for something entirely different -
> > transparency.
>
> Should we also require a detailed opinion from the DAM for each person who
> is admitted to the project, or only for those that were once admitted but
> who the DAM has subsequently decided to expel?

We have public records of new DMs and DDs with quite verbose
justifications:

- Application Manager recommendations

- plus the supporting messages by people working with prospective
 DMs/DDs,

- plus people sponsoring work before they join (for people working on
 packaging), or similarly reviewing their actions on VCS or working on
 teams (e.g. organising Debconf)

- plus keyring changes notices

- plus announcements every now and then in monthly news or similar about
 "Welcome new contributors / DMs / DDs"


Cheers.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>